An
assessment on the role of technology in the 21st century
classroom: It’s the classroom that’s the
disruption!
The audacity
of such a statement is almost laughable.
Who would dare suggest such a ludicrous idea, especially in an age where
students can barely break away from their electronic devices long enough to devote
at least ½ hour of undivided attention to guided scholastic instruction? Since when did the latest social network
update, media events or sports highlights and commentary become the priority,
and academics second? Such a statement
is surely a product of the “signs of the times”, when students shall rise up
against their teachers, and cause them to be put to death!
And yet the
words spoken by Mark Pesce in his speech “Those Wacky Kids” just over 5
years ago, truly struck me between the eyes with dead-on accuracy. Undeniably, in my teaching experience I have
noticed that some students have viewed academic material as simple “hurdles” to
be jumped over, just to get a grade and say that they’ve done what they’ve been
asked to do. For those students, my
challenge was to construct lessons and activities that would build a greater
understanding and personal relevance, even if that perspective wasn’t clear at
first. However, if the methods I as a
teacher have been implementing are completely irrelevant to their current
social context, then certainly the
classroom is the disruption and a true safe haven for Mr. Winkle has been created, as depicted here:
Pesce also
notes that “students have lost respect for the classroom, because it has no relevance
to their lives.” This is quite the paradigm shift for many like me who have
grown up where it was the students who needed to adapt to the climate of
education, and not vise versa. As
challenging as this may be for some to accept, this is not a weakness by any
stretch of the imagination. The fact
that young people are not only able to
constantly remain interconnected to both people and information, but produce
and “upload” this information as well means that each individual has the
ability to be an instant contributor to society, and be self-taught to boot!
As Pesce
pointed out, our students live in an age of “hyperconnectivity”, and are shaped
by their social experiences. Coupling
the belief that children learn through interactions with their environment with
Thomas Friedman’s
observations that since the turn of the new millennium a platform has
emerged that allows individuals to have more equal ability to “plug, play,
compete, connect and collaborate, globally,” it is even more obvious that is
only the classrooms that have failed to adapt.
In my
current Religion classroom, such an adaptation opens up many possibilities. Equipping and empowering students to share
their faith within their immediate context would be incredible, and I look
forward to learning of more versatile methods to utilize besides social
media. Yet as technology is further
incorporated, the challenge remains to be able to teach students how to focus
and occasionally get “unplugged” to spend the time necessary with God. Technology has created a different dynamic on
so many issues, whereas families may not even have family dinner together, yet
spend more time connected to both friends and strangers alike. How much more difficult might it be to intentionally
move away into solitude to spend precious hours alone with our Saviour, as He
did with His Father while here on earth?
The crux of
the matter is, to truly teach our students, we must meet them where they are,
within their current context of technology, and model the behaviour needed to
give them the tools to succeed. Truly, the
work of education and redemption are indeed one.
When you say that we need to "meet students where they are" does that imply acceptance that they have and use their technology, and model appropriate behaviour outside of that? When you say "other versatile methods" outside of social media, what are you referring to? I agree that students do need to learn to focus, however I am not sure if "unplugging" is realistic in today's world.
ReplyDeleteYes, meeting students "where they are" for me means seeking to possibly let their technological expertise be a "meeting space", instead of, merely, within the four walls of the classroom.
DeleteI also realize that the statement "versatile methods to utilize BESIDES social media" is QUITE misleading. In the past, I may have challenged students to upload course-related content and student products on Facebook, Twitter, and the other forums that I knew students LIVED on. However, my mind is now opening up to utilizing social media as part of the "discovery" phase, and collaborating with others through other technological tools (Wikis, Social Bookmarking, are just a few that were thrown my way, so-to-speak). Granted, it's ALL SOCIAL MEDIA, but I believe many students may be as ignorant to the potential of these tools as I am. I'm looking forward to unlocking that power together.
And yes, unplugging is challenging (even for short periods of time), but it's still a necessary skill for ALL of us to learn (not just students). This generation is growing up in a world without borders, but we ALL need to set limits and boundaries. In the same way that internet etiquette should be taught due to privacy concerns, the importance of "downtime" should be modelled as well. Just because we CAN do something, doesn't mean we SHOULD. (1 Cor. 6:12, 10:23)